Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 15:40:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 633A5C8975A3C353DCA72DA1B908FB4902D086804D8D03E3BEB4F9BB6D6D31F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was not given any proof of the existence of any tapes, and the allegations were retracted by Ransome soon after they were initially made. These are only allegations and the post is presenting them as a fact. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/08/epstein-sex-tapes-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-richard-branson-witness-claimed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744645009465319667
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 633A5C8975A3C353DCA72DA1B908FB4902D086804D8D03E3BEB4F9BB6D6D31F4
createdAtMillis - 1704814805564
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1744645009465319667633A5C8975A3C353DCA72DA1B908FB4902D086804D8D03E3BEB4F9BB6D6D31F4