Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 14:33:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39DE925EB5040001577ADC7A33E8C75E01E64C9A6E1539FCB8A9542805105B37
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was not given any proof of the existence of any tapes, and the allegations were retracted by Ransome soon after they were initially made. These are only allegations and the post is presenting them as a fact. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/08/epstein-sex-tapes-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-richard-branson-witness-claimed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744645009465319667
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39DE925EB5040001577ADC7A33E8C75E01E64C9A6E1539FCB8A9542805105B37
  • createdAtMillis - 1704810810668
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174464500946531966739DE925EB5040001577ADC7A33E8C75E01E64C9A6E1539FCB8A9542805105B37