Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 11:41:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BB73CEE71EC72CF06D86D3148621F2B0C91C589993B8D696E72AE38C43ACF5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was not given any proof of the existence of any tapes, and the allegations were retracted by Ransome soon after they were initially made. These are only allegations and the post is presenting them as a fact. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/08/epstein-sex-tapes-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-richard-branson-witness-claimed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744645009465319667
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BB73CEE71EC72CF06D86D3148621F2B0C91C589993B8D696E72AE38C43ACF5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1704800474506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17446450094653196672BB73CEE71EC72CF06D86D3148621F2B0C91C589993B8D696E72AE38C43ACF5A