Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 11:43:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 245D5A618A448FABA0C9BA50FDD8D35642510C04E591ACC02171CFFB6A8C2DFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court was not given any proof of the existence of any tapes, and the allegations were retracted by Ransome soon after they were initially made. These are only allegations and the post is presenting them as a fact. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/08/epstein-sex-tapes-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-richard-branson-witness-claimed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1744645009465319667
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 245D5A618A448FABA0C9BA50FDD8D35642510C04E591ACC02171CFFB6A8C2DFD
createdAtMillis - 1704800625883
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1744645009465319667245D5A618A448FABA0C9BA50FDD8D35642510C04E591ACC02171CFFB6A8C2DFD