Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 10:29:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C
Participant Details

Original Note:

"A meta-analysis is only as good as the studies in it" https://methods.cochrane.org/sites/methods.cochrane.org.statistics/files/uploads/SMGworkshopsEdinburgh/10_intro_meta-analysis.pdf This meta-analysis includes studies with high bias, multiple interventions, retrospective, observational and even a literal survey: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34781604/ Making this a garbage meta-analysis with high bias and misleading results.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744594996857348204
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 77F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C
  • createdAtMillis - 1704796182612
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174459499685734820477F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C