Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 20:59:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information in the proposed notes may be valuable to some readers, the post itself is fairly clearly making an analogy - perhaps an inaccurate or crass one, but not one likely to be read literally. Such challenges to this analogy would be more welcome in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744564549456445929
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90
  • createdAtMillis - 1705352369875
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744564549456445929992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90