Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 13:51:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 891D2352DB4F9581B0269028D1203CD842CA32738048C0FD1EE645C4655BEF0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information in the proposed notes may be valuable to some readers, the post itself is fairly clearly making an analogy - perhaps an inaccurate or crass one, but not one likely to be read literally. Such challenges to this analogy would be more welcome in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744564549456445929
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 891D2352DB4F9581B0269028D1203CD842CA32738048C0FD1EE645C4655BEF0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1704808309542
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744564549456445929891D2352DB4F9581B0269028D1203CD842CA32738048C0FD1EE645C4655BEF0E