Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 16:58:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83FE8BADD3E663DFE5A778832B1DA5E224EAF41994D7792B21C0D02DB8F4A3E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the information in the proposed notes may be valuable to some readers, the post itself is fairly clearly making an analogy - perhaps an inaccurate or crass one, but not one likely to be read literally. Such challenges to this analogy would be more welcome in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744564549456445929
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83FE8BADD3E663DFE5A778832B1DA5E224EAF41994D7792B21C0D02DB8F4A3E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1704819523752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174456454945644592983FE8BADD3E663DFE5A778832B1DA5E224EAF41994D7792B21C0D02DB8F4A3E6