Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 01:58:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8A98D7B5D5B614EA50F79BEE136D540E4C32CDECBC07741CFF9CF4DB68EE796
Participant Details

Original Note:

気象庁の分析により、酸性雨の中にポストの主張する成分は含まれていないことが分かっています。無闇に危機感を煽るポストには意味がないことを私たちは理解し、正しい情報の普及に努めるべぎです。 https://www.data.jma.go.jp/env/acid/acid_obs.html#analysis_method

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744533561716474210
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8A98D7B5D5B614EA50F79BEE136D540E4C32CDECBC07741CFF9CF4DB68EE796
  • createdAtMillis - 1704765487303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744533561716474210D8A98D7B5D5B614EA50F79BEE136D540E4C32CDECBC07741CFF9CF4DB68EE796