Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 13:55:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35C2BB64A636BF5F52E2452D63E6156CD010A18EB7F727252617C441E6803EA5
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The author explains the context of these allegations, states they are only allegations, and how they were unsealed at the request of Alan Dershowitz, who believed they showed the witness to be not credible. Source of the document: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1332/16/giuffre-v-maxwell/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744470610401538392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35C2BB64A636BF5F52E2452D63E6156CD010A18EB7F727252617C441E6803EA5
  • createdAtMillis - 1704808533581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174447061040153839235C2BB64A636BF5F52E2452D63E6156CD010A18EB7F727252617C441E6803EA5