Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 20:46:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5CDA5583F5A1C35F417FB014D23138B4DF4034E945CB8E73200694EDF78BA081
Participant Details

Original Note:

The fact that it was covered in detail by Private Eye does not mean it was widely read. PE has a subs base of 246,784 https://www.eyeads.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Private-Eye-Media-Pack-2023.pdf It has been covered by marginal news outlets, Private Eye, Regional BBC programmes and Computer Weekly. So it is fair to say it has not been covered 'widely'.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744437141608763615
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5CDA5583F5A1C35F417FB014D23138B4DF4034E945CB8E73200694EDF78BA081
  • createdAtMillis - 1704746772209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17444371416087636155CDA5583F5A1C35F417FB014D23138B4DF4034E945CB8E73200694EDF78BA081