Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 06:08:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 991A209035426D51BDB39E77B9A565674F5523024F56BCB282862C3B0A1F204F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn-first, the note is wrong in the second portion by adjusting for the split twice (all commonly used electronic charts present a split adjusted price, so no need to account for that again) Second-Doug is presenting something so outrageous that is should be considered a joke

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744419675885236734
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 991A209035426D51BDB39E77B9A565674F5523024F56BCB282862C3B0A1F204F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704780532124
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744419675885236734991A209035426D51BDB39E77B9A565674F5523024F56BCB282862C3B0A1F204F