Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 19:36:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B91956B72063A58746EC9F0D7331721744E748212EFF120C4CC8F7A0055EBF65
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il tweet riporta solo il virgolettato della valutazione del VAR in campo. L'articolo linkato riporta anche che la valutazione del VAR è stata ritenuta errata dai vertici AIA. Riportare solo il virgolettato può far pensare che la decisione di convalidare il goal sia stata giusta https://www.sportface.it/calcio/genoa-inter-var-irrati-su-bisseck-bani-no-questa-non-e-spinta-gol-corretto-riprendi-il-gioco/2416350

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744395294228217899
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B91956B72063A58746EC9F0D7331721744E748212EFF120C4CC8F7A0055EBF65
  • createdAtMillis - 1704742573294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744395294228217899B91956B72063A58746EC9F0D7331721744E748212EFF120C4CC8F7A0055EBF65