Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 22:42:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E692174DA97B75C4B50948EB6DB7C7A9C531DF2D35F667DEA9E6EC49BB0A70B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il post di Borghi ha chiaramente un contenuto sarcastico senza alcuna pretesa di scientificità. Il luogo corretto per eventuali contestazioni sono i commenti, non le note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744331759859249659
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E692174DA97B75C4B50948EB6DB7C7A9C531DF2D35F667DEA9E6EC49BB0A70B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1708641751579
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744331759859249659E692174DA97B75C4B50948EB6DB7C7A9C531DF2D35F667DEA9E6EC49BB0A70B5