Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 02:00:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7A75C135DB76578B4C735C82E6E9E6CC103755D6F08315C9CD4024E52D3929F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most were private prosecutions, but not all. Notes are not correct to say the CPS was not involved at all. "there have been six appeals to date in which the CPS was the Respondent, not Post Office." https://corporate.postoffice.co.uk/en/horizon-scandal-pages/faqs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744329001542287573
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7A75C135DB76578B4C735C82E6E9E6CC103755D6F08315C9CD4024E52D3929F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704765612312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744329001542287573E7A75C135DB76578B4C735C82E6E9E6CC103755D6F08315C9CD4024E52D3929F