Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 05:08:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21E5637C49F48A0C4AF4C83ADF5225029B13DB9D21C044F9FEDD31E9B175BD94
Participant Details

Original Note:

WSJは権威ある報道機関であり、その取材に基づく記事にさらなるソースを求めることは不合理である。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744205942345142308
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21E5637C49F48A0C4AF4C83ADF5225029B13DB9D21C044F9FEDD31E9B175BD94
  • createdAtMillis - 1704690536391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174420594234514230821E5637C49F48A0C4AF4C83ADF5225029B13DB9D21C044F9FEDD31E9B175BD94