Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 01:39:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B92A21CBCA70321CB87843370912AE9498B7C9D8E28258BCF75196229FF421B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

先に付いているノートはあくまでも部外者の個人的見解に過ぎず、政府の公式見解としてはどうであるのかを記者が問い政府が答えるのは当然のこと 故に先のノートは不要であると言わざるを得ない

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744166740978991288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B92A21CBCA70321CB87843370912AE9498B7C9D8E28258BCF75196229FF421B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1704677991219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744166740978991288B92A21CBCA70321CB87843370912AE9498B7C9D8E28258BCF75196229FF421B1