Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 11:51:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 974F466F081D61EEC0F89C5D9663440D4B2DC95F419606050A1A5A60CA6E05EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

先に付いているノートはあくまでも部外者の個人的見解に過ぎず、政府の公式見解としてはどうであるのかを記者が問い政府が答えるのは当然のこと 故に先のノートは不要であると言わざるを得ない

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744166740978991288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 974F466F081D61EEC0F89C5D9663440D4B2DC95F419606050A1A5A60CA6E05EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1704801115793
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744166740978991288974F466F081D61EEC0F89C5D9663440D4B2DC95F419606050A1A5A60CA6E05EF