Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 04:49:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 074812A676A8D17A2325F555702FD55E7A07D321B5A12C1A55DA76F53502F179
Participant Details

Original Note:

先に付いているノートはあくまでも部外者の個人的見解に過ぎず、政府の公式見解としてはどうであるのかを記者が問い政府が答えるのは当然のこと 故に先のノートは不要であると言わざるを得ない

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744166740978991288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 074812A676A8D17A2325F555702FD55E7A07D321B5A12C1A55DA76F53502F179
  • createdAtMillis - 1704689391350
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744166740978991288074812A676A8D17A2325F555702FD55E7A07D321B5A12C1A55DA76F53502F179