Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 22:15:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BB2D11D382D0172A04F6FDC98E534E5C527FC195B704147609E3EC3412CB24A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - mis à part que l’auteur de la CN précédente soit complètement con, le poste de Antoine Leaument montre bel et bien que le top réalisé n’est pas fiable et ne remet en aucun cas en doute la place de EM et de JLM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744114797807898782
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BB2D11D382D0172A04F6FDC98E534E5C527FC195B704147609E3EC3412CB24A
  • createdAtMillis - 1704665757811
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17441147978078987826BB2D11D382D0172A04F6FDC98E534E5C527FC195B704147609E3EC3412CB24A