Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 00:15:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 578AE0D2C440F1A57A412DC0395B95EAFEB4612F62AEF9DA7A57BE0FE3F2D1F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - mis à part que l’auteur de la CN précédente soit complètement con, le poste de Antoine Leaument montre bel et bien que le top réalisé n’est pas fiable et ne remet en aucun cas en doute la place de EM et de JLM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744114797807898782
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 578AE0D2C440F1A57A412DC0395B95EAFEB4612F62AEF9DA7A57BE0FE3F2D1F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1704672955466
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1744114797807898782578AE0D2C440F1A57A412DC0395B95EAFEB4612F62AEF9DA7A57BE0FE3F2D1F2