Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 00:45:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51E3D94F41F4EC677C6E62A115DEB0BD1D2AD24DE254D3AB9405A8AE901CA6B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - mis à part que l’auteur de la CN précédente soit complètement con, le poste de Antoine Leaument montre bel et bien que le top réalisé n’est pas fiable et ne remet en aucun cas en doute la place de EM et de JLM

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744114797807898782
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51E3D94F41F4EC677C6E62A115DEB0BD1D2AD24DE254D3AB9405A8AE901CA6B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1704674757361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174411479780789878251E3D94F41F4EC677C6E62A115DEB0BD1D2AD24DE254D3AB9405A8AE901CA6B8