Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 02:31:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78838FF0318EC521B9D08B6B4CD315B47EEE45C4583C4D32EDDD5633461CE726
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP links uses their own substack page as "evidence". That is NOT how peer-review works. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/peer-review The OP is engaging in mere "Free Speech", rather than anything with any scientific or medical credibility whatsoever. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/free-speech

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744030525793186235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78838FF0318EC521B9D08B6B4CD315B47EEE45C4583C4D32EDDD5633461CE726
  • createdAtMillis - 1704681112213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174403052579318623578838FF0318EC521B9D08B6B4CD315B47EEE45C4583C4D32EDDD5633461CE726