Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 17:07:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP links uses their own substack page as "evidence". That is NOT how peer-review works. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/peer-review The OP is engaging in mere "Free Speech", rather than anything with any scientific or medical credibility whatsoever. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/free-speech

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744030525793186235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1704647254437
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174403052579318623549BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2