Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 16:26:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP links uses their own substack page as "evidence". That is NOT how peer-review works. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/peer-review The OP is engaging in mere "Free Speech", rather than anything with any scientific or medical credibility whatsoever. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/free-speech

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744030525793186235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
  • createdAtMillis - 1704731180016
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17440305257931862350A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D