Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 19:04:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECA36F4E1D9518F8FF4875ACE6B6B27FADD575640DF1A21270183665EC64687F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Für Meinungen bitte die Kommentare nutzen. Das Cochrane-Review zu Masken ist umstritten, ebenso einer der Autoren. Deshalb gab es auch eine Richtigstellung von Cochrane: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/gesundheit/medizin-masken-corona-pandemie-ffp2-gesundheit-lockdown-1.5767982 Die Evidenz für den Nutzen von Masken ist unter etablierten ExpertInnen unumstritten.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743949188314902601
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECA36F4E1D9518F8FF4875ACE6B6B27FADD575640DF1A21270183665EC64687F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704654244938
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743949188314902601ECA36F4E1D9518F8FF4875ACE6B6B27FADD575640DF1A21270183665EC64687F