Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 10:49:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2EB817DBB3381ACC44B433CC8CAFF852ABB56DEFDCBED9BB7D045EFDC54D7A3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The existing critical note includes the phrase "no evidence," a logically fallacious argument from ignorance. There *is* substantial evidence when the word 'evidence’ is correctly defined. Also the post expresses an opinion about an important public health crisis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743945498606620836
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2EB817DBB3381ACC44B433CC8CAFF852ABB56DEFDCBED9BB7D045EFDC54D7A3C
  • createdAtMillis - 1704624573963
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17439454986066208362EB817DBB3381ACC44B433CC8CAFF852ABB56DEFDCBED9BB7D045EFDC54D7A3C