Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 13:07:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - If there was ever a tweet that would obviously fall under the umbrella of "personal opinion", it's this one. And the argument in the two notes is a non-sequitur of the First Amendment ruling (which is true) with the opinion as to the effect on the fabric of society.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743766982183600234
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1739106448071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743766982183600234F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE