Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 22:57:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2542EBAA7A75C87A39828B0674334C1837338224D3E71D99F41763D04D4B486D
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN needs to have a rating system for note contributors. If you write notes which are obviously partisan or from some type of agenda, you should be graded by other contributors. Multiple down voted notes from a particular individual should hold less weight.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743752044442169403
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2542EBAA7A75C87A39828B0674334C1837338224D3E71D99F41763D04D4B486D
  • createdAtMillis - 1704581850358
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17437520444421694032542EBAA7A75C87A39828B0674334C1837338224D3E71D99F41763D04D4B486D