Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 04:36:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 028398424380E0B74C72CE027A6AA18EA01D4B198CD8D34FD11753B0A5EB6C5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN needs to have a rating system for note contributors. If you write notes which are obviously partisan or from some type of agenda, you should be graded by other contributors. Multiple down voted notes from a particular individual should hold less weight.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743752044442169403
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 028398424380E0B74C72CE027A6AA18EA01D4B198CD8D34FD11753B0A5EB6C5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1704602172938
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743752044442169403028398424380E0B74C72CE027A6AA18EA01D4B198CD8D34FD11753B0A5EB6C5B