Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 02:01:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02209C664FACBA1C202BBF5837A39F6C12DC28A66F6905425A5C60EDFF8D887E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note author that provided the link below failed to read the article, which confirms that there were indeed firearms present on Jan 6. The article linked also confirms that an insurrection doesn’t require firearms to be present. https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-were-there-armed-protesters-capitol-january-6-1715326

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743750936424771802
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02209C664FACBA1C202BBF5837A39F6C12DC28A66F6905425A5C60EDFF8D887E
  • createdAtMillis - 1704592876746
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174375093642477180202209C664FACBA1C202BBF5837A39F6C12DC28A66F6905425A5C60EDFF8D887E