Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 20:34:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E8423C9928EA53ACF25EFF2A8810CE6A49EAC6A16FC3DAE455D68DC3E2AC8ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Yet the connection has remained hazy… with many studies failing to account for confounding variables… The published studies are also subject to “publication bias,” the tendency to publish only more noteworthy findings.” Quote from linked source in above CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743661231137784061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E8423C9928EA53ACF25EFF2A8810CE6A49EAC6A16FC3DAE455D68DC3E2AC8ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1704573277620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17436612311377840610E8423C9928EA53ACF25EFF2A8810CE6A49EAC6A16FC3DAE455D68DC3E2AC8ED