Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 01:22:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 160077E9623FC9ED17F35AF8BA9AD31671A2ABB11F8A11A568AE667EBD033DF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed notes ignore the majority of these cases were dropped by the plaintiffs or dismissed on technicalities. "failed" implies they lost on merits when most weren't even heard. Also, the original post is an opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743651784373993737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 160077E9623FC9ED17F35AF8BA9AD31671A2ABB11F8A11A568AE667EBD033DF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1704590574909
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743651784373993737160077E9623FC9ED17F35AF8BA9AD31671A2ABB11F8A11A568AE667EBD033DF6