Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 16:16:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F47B25A440A132DAEAD13D101C4BE5654580E9A6704E6DBCA244BC2811502369
Participant Details

Original Note:

O estudo citado é falho: 1) Somente considera pessoas hospitalizadas (não inclui os que evitaram necessidade de internação hospitalar) 2) Exclui a maioria de países afetados (Brasil por exemplo não fez parte) 3) Dados mais robustos indicam a tea eficácia da hidroxicloroquina: https://c19hcq.org/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743626574690181217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F47B25A440A132DAEAD13D101C4BE5654580E9A6704E6DBCA244BC2811502369
  • createdAtMillis - 1705076201397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743626574690181217F47B25A440A132DAEAD13D101C4BE5654580E9A6704E6DBCA244BC2811502369