Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 13:34:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85F262F3927357DEED85263A64696730FDB2FCC210C37F52B15AD75AF40DBAEB
Participant Details

Original Note:

O estudo citado é falho: 1) Somente considera pessoas hospitalizadas (não inclui os que evitaram necessidade de internação hospitalar) 2) Exclui a maioria de países afetados (Brasil por exemplo não fez parte) 3) Dados mais robustos indicam a tea eficácia da hidroxicloroquina: https://c19hcq.org/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743626574690181217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85F262F3927357DEED85263A64696730FDB2FCC210C37F52B15AD75AF40DBAEB
  • createdAtMillis - 1704548074405
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174362657469018121785F262F3927357DEED85263A64696730FDB2FCC210C37F52B15AD75AF40DBAEB