Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 05:57:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF396229B01E94B50C604AA95E6B83F947E62F8D8EAB60682EAC40EAC5F847A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post asks rhetorical questions then goes on to discuss opinion. As for the note trying to damage the dissertation's (and authors) standing, the *accusations* are from a version of Wikipedia not in use when dissertation was written, are paraphrase not copy and are definitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743568157028045251
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF396229B01E94B50C604AA95E6B83F947E62F8D8EAB60682EAC40EAC5F847A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1704693437637
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743568157028045251BF396229B01E94B50C604AA95E6B83F947E62F8D8EAB60682EAC40EAC5F847A4