Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 14:10:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16C5B03EC7C3A2E632F0F552C347EC72B0802E1C065E95C3491FF570429C190D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post asks rhetorical questions then goes on to discuss opinion. As for the note trying to damage the dissertation's (and authors) standing, the *accusations* are from a version of Wikipedia not in use when dissertation was written, are paraphrase not copy and are definitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743568157028045251
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16C5B03EC7C3A2E632F0F552C347EC72B0802E1C065E95C3491FF570429C190D
  • createdAtMillis - 1704550253225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174356815702804525116C5B03EC7C3A2E632F0F552C347EC72B0802E1C065E95C3491FF570429C190D