Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 12:18:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BEB16B8F118877B1F9E46BCF868A1317305163A702CD1E6B6F0DC7F82AF688D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It is clearly an opinion and it is for the court to make the determination on whether the claims made by SA are baseless or not. It is not for social media users to decide this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743566806818681136
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BEB16B8F118877B1F9E46BCF868A1317305163A702CD1E6B6F0DC7F82AF688D
  • createdAtMillis - 1704543487361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17435668068186811367BEB16B8F118877B1F9E46BCF868A1317305163A702CD1E6B6F0DC7F82AF688D