Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 05:59:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8861A0D916C84E0D654F937B9FF3807DE73A6384731FAECD67DB16435C2AE4F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fake screenshot. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2SG0RF/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743484757579640889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8861A0D916C84E0D654F937B9FF3807DE73A6384731FAECD67DB16435C2AE4F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1704520744539
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17434847575796408898861A0D916C84E0D654F937B9FF3807DE73A6384731FAECD67DB16435C2AE4F4