Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 04:49:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5333785B0DBC084E4145DF4943451D539E60658A6D3AFCA81A0F14FE5F05A182
Participant Details

Original Note:

La refutación a las opiniones va en la caja de respuestas. Además, el post no necesita una nota porque el artículo de la BBC, constituye un punto de vista de su autor, en todo caso, el desacuerdo que pueda existir con esa nota no debe desfogarse en las CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743437241890820314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5333785B0DBC084E4145DF4943451D539E60658A6D3AFCA81A0F14FE5F05A182
  • createdAtMillis - 1704516573084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17434372418908203145333785B0DBC084E4145DF4943451D539E60658A6D3AFCA81A0F14FE5F05A182