Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 03:07:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2FFF6D3CB296BF63992395AEC44072AA03A5D27EBB123E65BB0F9FAD7E670C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the post is factually accurate, There are no drag queens on Epstein's list, and all the post does is observe that. it doesn't make any comments about the broader debate. Any conclusions/opinions drawn from this post's simple statement of fact should be left to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743395238117249142
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2FFF6D3CB296BF63992395AEC44072AA03A5D27EBB123E65BB0F9FAD7E670C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1704596834954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743395238117249142C2FFF6D3CB296BF63992395AEC44072AA03A5D27EBB123E65BB0F9FAD7E670C4