Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 05:19:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FA1271BAA25B7599EAB77E0D0FDAF64E60E07AA1453B4C3FDB26B386F11214B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This post expresses a personal opinion about The Economist’s decision to publish an article. It contains no factual error. Disagreements belong in comments, not in Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743380782456930721
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FA1271BAA25B7599EAB77E0D0FDAF64E60E07AA1453B4C3FDB26B386F11214B
  • createdAtMillis - 1704518349838
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17433807824569307219FA1271BAA25B7599EAB77E0D0FDAF64E60E07AA1453B4C3FDB26B386F11214B