Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 12:25:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06DC95A4E0A8E98752E20436347A36BE65DA038FA3663A9428DF41AD21578426
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This post expresses a personal opinion about The Economist’s decision to publish an article. It contains no factual error. Disagreements belong in comments, not in Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743380782456930721
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06DC95A4E0A8E98752E20436347A36BE65DA038FA3663A9428DF41AD21578426
  • createdAtMillis - 1704543939397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174338078245693072106DC95A4E0A8E98752E20436347A36BE65DA038FA3663A9428DF41AD21578426