Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 18:59:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB6FEB5A8BDB8FB17B535B7E9639B52CF0DEA4C00FB8BD1856B6F16B15A94F7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. A la segunda nota. No es una nómina, es un plus. A la primera nota. No especifica el rango salarial, sólo demuestra una realidad fiscal en un caso concreto. Las opiniones personales en las respuestas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743344555699708053
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB6FEB5A8BDB8FB17B535B7E9639B52CF0DEA4C00FB8BD1856B6F16B15A94F7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1704481141666
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743344555699708053BB6FEB5A8BDB8FB17B535B7E9639B52CF0DEA4C00FB8BD1856B6F16B15A94F7D