Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-06 08:42:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39B89753D90A89BDAEA1505346EEF64836BED424A53E681C8B01BB8F1E7719D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. A la segunda nota. No es una nómina, es un plus. A la primera nota. No especifica el rango salarial, sólo demuestra una realidad fiscal en un caso concreto. Las opiniones personales en las respuestas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743344555699708053
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39B89753D90A89BDAEA1505346EEF64836BED424A53E681C8B01BB8F1E7719D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1704530537663
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174334455569970805339B89753D90A89BDAEA1505346EEF64836BED424A53E681C8B01BB8F1E7719D6