Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 17:18:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18AAAE7E81556A93B50A01F5EE9A4AF7078AD76088EF36ECAD1479217206EACC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Este post é puramente factual. As notas de comunidade devem ser utilizadas para corrigir desinformação em posts que contém a desinformação em específico. O mal uso da ferramenta afeta sua credibilidade. Discussões sobre a reputação da página devem ser feitas nos comentários. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1743319562303467602
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 18AAAE7E81556A93B50A01F5EE9A4AF7078AD76088EF36ECAD1479217206EACC
createdAtMillis - 1704475089219
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 174331956230346760218AAAE7E81556A93B50A01F5EE9A4AF7078AD76088EF36ECAD1479217206EACC