Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 16:29:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B64B92723096B660C9BF61C1315F10BF643F67F424E8948BD7E222DD837B2766
Participant Details

Original Note:

No one at the Post has read her dissertation not is there anyone there who understands it. She explained the citation errors. Citation errors are *not* plagiarism as she is not passing off someone else work as her own. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/59192

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743302863151890666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B64B92723096B660C9BF61C1315F10BF643F67F424E8948BD7E222DD837B2766
  • createdAtMillis - 1704472177832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743302863151890666B64B92723096B660C9BF61C1315F10BF643F67F424E8948BD7E222DD837B2766