Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 17:15:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E74D6F25D89095E3336490E650FECE50CF51128E0933A4400793D8C8F696FA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is misleading - a huge portion of that 4000 takes the form of appendices and public comments. The actual review is much shorter. https://new.mta.info/document/111281

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743252982538387961
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E74D6F25D89095E3336490E650FECE50CF51128E0933A4400793D8C8F696FA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1717607748147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17432529825383879610E74D6F25D89095E3336490E650FECE50CF51128E0933A4400793D8C8F696FA3