Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 15:31:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71E0BC3B7C0855E6460F450242A6DF0E1E5BF89B36BF5076D50A62D8854E94A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://archive.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-8-1.html: "Models show significant and increasing skill in [..] precipitation"; in de tropen is neerslag minder betrouwbaar. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abd351: "most {CMIP6 models} pass two key tests [] that support the usefulness of fractional measures to evaluate future changes in probability of precip extremes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743228123028541518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71E0BC3B7C0855E6460F450242A6DF0E1E5BF89B36BF5076D50A62D8854E94A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1704468679950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 174322812302854151871E0BC3B7C0855E6460F450242A6DF0E1E5BF89B36BF5076D50A62D8854E94A3