Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 01:22:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0C0ECC82330AA0494199E9015C68F5FAFB657B1B163BFE123B1E622CE39C6EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original tweet does not confirm or deny this is plagiarism. The proposed note is itself misleading, as the cases cited involve far more substantial copying and in some cases completely misrepresenting authorship.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743160090843382108
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0C0ECC82330AA0494199E9015C68F5FAFB657B1B163BFE123B1E622CE39C6EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1704590579264
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743160090843382108E0C0ECC82330AA0494199E9015C68F5FAFB657B1B163BFE123B1E622CE39C6EC